Scope and authorize
We agree what is in scope, what is off limits, and when we test. You get written authorization and named testers before anything starts.
A hands-on test of your web application — how it authenticates people, what it lets each of them reach and where its logic can be bent — carried out the way a real attacker would, then written up so your engineers can fix what we find.
Scanners find the flaws that look the same everywhere. The ones that matter in your application usually don’t: a role that can read another customer’s records, a checkout step that can be replayed, an admin function that was only ever hidden by the menu. Those take a person who understands what your application is for.
We test every role you give us, from anonymous visitor to administrator, and we test them against each other. When we find something, we prove it — with the request, the response and the data it exposed — so nobody has to take our word for it.
Typically one to two weeks of testing for a mid-sized application, confirmed at scoping.
We agree what is in scope, what is off limits, and when we test. You get written authorization and named testers before anything starts.
We walk the whole application as each role you have given us, so testing covers what the interface exposes and what it does not.
Tooling handles the repetitive sweeps. People decide what to chase, how to chain it and what it would actually cost you.
Each finding is validated and evidenced, and where issues combine into something worse, we show that too — no false alarms forwarded to your team.
You get the technical report, an executive summary, a walkthrough with the testers, and a retest to confirm your fixes worked.
Real examples of what this engagement uncovers — anonymized, and never every time. What matters is that you find out before somebody else does.
One role reading or changing another role’s data
Endpoints that enforce nothing because the UI never offers the button
Checkout, quota or approval steps that can be replayed or reordered
Stored cross-site scripting that fires in an administrator’s browser
Keys and internal URLs shipped in the client-side bundle
These programs call for this test, or their assessors and your customers expect it. If one of them is on your desk, readiness and testing come from the same team.
Auditors evaluating monitoring (CC4.1) and system operations (CC7.1) commonly look for independent security testing of the application in scope, and enterprise buyers usually ask for a recent pentest summary alongside the SOC 2 report.
SOC 2 readinessControl 8.29 calls for security testing in development and acceptance; an independent application test is how many organizations evidence it for customer-facing systems.
ISO 27001 readinessRequirement 11.4.1 defines penetration testing to include the application layer, and e-commerce checkouts and payment applications are exactly where attackers aim.
PCI DSS readinessPatient portals and clinical applications are often the in-scope systems customers care most about, and application testing supports the related requirement statements.
HITRUST readinessWhen customers reach the financial application through the web, testing it supports the objective that access is restricted to authorized users.
SOC 1 readinessThe application wrapped around your model is part of the AI system, and its weaknesses are AI-system risks your impact and risk assessments should account for.
ISO 42001 readinessThe customer-facing application is usually the largest part of the attack surface inside the boundary, and the place agency reviewers look hardest.
FedRAMP readinessPublic-facing portals for residents and staff are the most exposed part of most state cloud services and the first thing a 3PAO or agency reviewer probes.
GovRAMP & TX-RAMP readinessPatient portals, provider dashboards and scheduling apps put ePHI one broken access check away from the wrong person.
HIPAA readinessPlatform and data security outcomes for the applications that hold your customers’ data are only proven by testing them.
NIST CSF readinessGDPR Article 32 and the CCPA’s reasonable-security duty both depend on applications that don’t leak personal data through broken access control.
Privacy: GDPR, CCPA & state laws readinessValidates the risks in the applications that hold customer data and gives auditors independent evidence that the related controls work.
Risk assessment readinessTests the applications your customers depend on and backs your secure development policy with real evidence.
Security program readinessFor software and SaaS targets, testing the product itself shows whether the asset you are paying for carries security flaws your new customers will eventually find.
M&A due diligence readinessMissing something on this list? Bring it to the call — we scope around what you have.
Keep the APIs that connect your products, partners and data from becoming the way in.
Read moreConfidence that one of your customers can never reach another customer’s data.
Read moreKeep your iOS and Android apps — and the services behind them — out of attackers’ hands.
Read moreMake sure your desktop apps, thick clients, browser extensions and agents don’t open a back door.
Read moreNot sure where to start? One of our testers reviews your internet-facing footprint and sends you a short summary of what an attacker would see — free. Nothing you don’t own is ever touched, and there’s no sales sequence.
Free. No obligation.