Subcontractors handed a flow-down
Your prime has asked for your SPRS score, your SSP and your target CMMC level. You need to know what your contracts genuinely require, and a credible path to it before the next award decision lands.
A CMMC level has appeared in a solicitation you want, or your prime has asked for your SPRS score and the date of your certification. Readiness tells you which level you actually need, what belongs in scope and where you stand against every requirement, so you walk into your assessment with a System Security Plan that matches how you work and evidence an assessor can verify — and your senior official can affirm with confidence.
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program is how the Department of Defense verifies that the companies it works with actually protect the information it shares. The program rule, 32 CFR Part 170, is in effect, and the DFARS acquisition rule is now putting CMMC levels into contracts on a phased basis through DFARS 252.204-7021. Once a level appears in a solicitation, meeting it is a condition of award, and your status has to stay current in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) for as long as you hold the contract.
The level follows the information. If you only handle Federal Contract Information (FCI), Level 1 asks for the basic safeguarding requirements of FAR 52.204-21, an annual self-assessment and an annual affirmation in SPRS. If you handle Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), Level 2 asks for all 110 requirements of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 — self-assessed for some contracts, and for most CUI work assessed by a Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) authorized by the Cyber AB. Level 3, reserved for the most sensitive programs, adds selected requirements from NIST SP 800-172, is assessed by the DoD’s own Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Assessment Center (DIBCAC), and builds on a Level 2 certification you must already hold.
Teams come to readiness because a CMMC assessment is unforgiving. Assessors test every assessment objective in NIST SP 800-171A, not just the headline of each requirement. Only certain lower-weighted requirements may sit on a Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M), conditional status depends on a minimum score and a close-out assessment, and a senior official signs an affirmation that carries real legal weight. A C3PAO can’t consult for a company it assesses, so the preparation has to come from someone on your side of the table — which is exactly where readiness sits.
Your prime has asked for your SPRS score, your SSP and your target CMMC level. You need to know what your contracts genuinely require, and a credible path to it before the next award decision lands.
CUI moves through your engineering, manufacturing, program and finance teams. You’re accountable for your own certification and for the suppliers beneath you, and you need one scope everyone agrees on.
You’ve won, or want to win, your first DoD contract. You need to understand FCI versus CUI, pick the right level and avoid building an expensive CUI environment the contract never called for.
You posted a NIST SP 800-171 score some time ago. Now a C3PAO will test it objective by objective and a senior official will affirm it, so the number has to be true.
Three defined packages, each with a clear scope and a clear set of deliverables, for defense contractors that hold CUI. Start with the one that matches where you are: you know exactly what you are buying, and every package ends with work your C3PAO can examine.
The gap assessment shows you what needs fixing. The SSP and POA&M put it on paper the way an assessor reads it. The Microsoft build closes the technical gaps where your CUI actually lives.
Know exactly where you stand before anyone scores you.
For Contractors whose contracts name Level 2 and who need an honest answer to “are we ready?”
You get your environment measured against every Level 2 requirement and assessment objective, to the standard a C3PAO applies. Your CUI boundary is drawn, your score is calculated honestly, and every gap is ranked by its point value and whether the rule lets you defer it. It is the low-risk first step: you leave with a plan, not a sales pitch.
Usually leads to the SSP + POA&M package
The documents your assessor reads first, written from your real environment.
For Contractors with no System Security Plan, or one that describes a system that no longer exists.
Your System Security Plan is the first thing a C3PAO reads and the document every other finding is checked against. You get one written from your actual environment, with a statement for each of the 110 requirements, and a POA&M that stays inside what the rule lets you defer. Your cloud and managed providers’ responsibilities are mapped in, so nothing falls between you and them.
Usually leads to the GCC High / Azure Government build
A Microsoft environment your CUI can live in, built for the requirements.
For Contractors whose CUI sits in commercial Microsoft 365, consumer file sharing or servers that can’t meet the requirements.
Your Microsoft 365 GCC High tenant, Azure Government workloads or CUI enclave is built and configured by engineers who secure Azure and Microsoft 365 for a living. Identity, devices, data protection and logging are set up for the requirements an assessor tests and documented as evidence for your SSP, while your mail, files and Teams move across with access rebuilt around least privilege.
Licenses for Microsoft 365 GCC High and Azure Government come from Microsoft or an authorized reseller, and Microsoft decides who is eligible. You get the environment designed, built, configured and documented.
CMMC is no longer a proposal. The program rule, 32 CFR Part 170, took effect on December 16, 2024, and set up the levels, the assessments and the ecosystem of assessors. The DFARS acquisition rule took effect on November 10, 2025, and gave contracting officers the clause, DFARS 252.204-7021, that puts a CMMC level into a solicitation and makes holding it a condition of award.
The DoD is bringing the requirement in over four rollout periods, each beginning on November 10. Each period widens what a solicitation can ask of you, ending in full implementation across every applicable contract, including option periods on work you already hold. Until then, the solicitation in front of you is what decides; the dates tell you when to expect each requirement to start appearing.
Solicitations and contracts that call for CMMC can require Level 1 (Self) or Level 2 (Self) status as a condition of award. The DoD may, at its discretion, require Level 2 (C3PAO) instead of a self-assessment, and may apply the requirement when an option is exercised.
32 CFR 170.3(e); DFARS 252.204-7021On top of the first period, applicable solicitations can require Level 2 (C3PAO) status as a condition of award. The DoD may defer that requirement to an option period, and may call for Level 3 (DIBCAC) in its place.
32 CFR 170.3(e); DFARS 252.204-7021Applicable solicitations can require Level 3 (DIBCAC) status as a condition of award, and Level 2 (C3PAO) status can be required before an option period is exercised on an existing contract.
32 CFR 170.3(e); DFARS 252.204-7021CMMC requirements are included in all applicable solicitations and contracts, including the exercise of option periods on contracts awarded before the rollout began.
32 CFR 170.3(e); DFARS 252.204-7021Three levels, four kinds of assessment. The information you handle sets the level; the solicitation sets whether you assess yourself or face an independent assessor. The requirements below come straight from the rule.
Answer three questions for a first read on where you land. Nothing you choose is stored or sent anywhere.
A starting point, not a determination. Your solicitation and contract decide the level and the assessment type; readiness puts that answer in writing for you.
A C3PAO authorized by the Cyber AB (Level 2 certification) or the DoD’s DIBCAC (Level 3); Level 1 and some Level 2 contracts rely on your own self-assessment and affirmation
A CMMC status — Final or Conditional — recorded in SPRS at the level your contract requires
Readiness is the work before the assessment: scoping, documentation, remediation and evidence. The certification decision belongs to the C3PAO or DIBCAC you face, and the affirmation belongs to your own senior official — never to the firm that helped you prepare.
Scope is the argument you make to an assessor about which parts of your company the assessment covers. Get it right and the assessment examines a system you understand and can evidence. Get it wrong and either the assessor widens it on the day, or you spend heavily protecting systems that never needed it.
At Level 2, the CMMC Scoping Guide sorts every asset into one of five categories. Each category is treated differently, and each comes with its own documentation an assessor expects to see.
Assets that process, store or transmit CUI: the laptops, servers, file shares, cloud tenants, engineering tools and people that touch it.
Assets that provide security functions or capabilities to the CUI environment, whether or not they touch CUI: identity providers, firewalls, logging and monitoring platforms, and the people and providers who run them.
Assets that can, but are not intended to, process, store or transmit CUI, because of the security policies, procedures and practices you have in place.
Assets that may handle CUI but cannot be fully secured: Internet of Things and operational technology devices, government-furnished equipment, restricted information systems and test equipment.
Assets that cannot process, store or transmit CUI and provide no security protection to CUI Assets.
An enclave is a deliberately narrow environment, on premises or in a government cloud tenant, where CUI lives and nowhere else. Only the people and systems that need CUI reach it, and everything outside it becomes out of scope or contractor risk managed, with the evidence to show why.
An enclave trades breadth for discipline. Fewer assets are assessed, but the boundary has to hold: separate identities or strong conditional access, controlled data transfer in and out, and no quiet copies of CUI back on the corporate network. For a company where CUI touches a few teams, it can shrink both the assessment and the cost of meeting it. For a company where CUI is everywhere, it can mean rebuilding how people work.
Readiness weighs the options against your contracts, your data flows and your people, and gives you a boundary you can defend before you build it.
Level 2 holds you to 110 requirements in 14 families. An assessor tests each one against the assessment objectives in NIST SP 800-171A, and a requirement is met only when every objective behind it is.
Who and what can reach CUI, from where, and with what privileges.
People who handle CUI knowing the risks and their duties.
A trail of who did what on the systems that hold CUI.
Systems built and kept in a known, hardened state.
Proof of identity for every user, process and device.
Detecting, reporting and recovering from incidents.
Maintenance that does not become a way in.
CUI on paper, drives and removable media.
Trust in the people given access to CUI.
Physical access to systems and to CUI itself.
Knowing your risks and the vulnerabilities behind them.
Checking your own controls, planning the fixes and documenting the system.
CUI in transit and at the boundary.
Finding and fixing flaws and malicious code.
Every Level 2 assessment, self or C3PAO, produces a score under the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology. You start at 110, one point for each requirement, and subtract a weighted value for each requirement not met: 5, 3 or 1 point, depending on how much harm leaving it open could do. Because the heaviest requirements carry 5 points, a score can fall far below zero.
The score is entered in SPRS and decides your status. Final status means every requirement is met. Conditional status means you reached the minimum score the rule sets and every open item is one the rule allows on a POA&M. Conditional status lasts only for the close-out window the rule sets, so it is a bridge, not a destination.
A sample set of open requirements, not a client. Weights are from the DoD Assessment Methodology.
Partial credit: in place for remote and privileged access, missing for general network access. Worth more than 1 point, so it has to be closed before the assessment.
Encryption is in place but its modules are not FIPS-validated. This is the one higher-weighted gap the rule lets you defer.
A 1-point requirement, eligible for a POA&M.
A 1-point requirement, eligible for a POA&M.
A 1-point requirement, eligible for a POA&M.
Score: 101 of 110. That clears the 88 minimum, yet Conditional status is out of reach while multifactor authentication for general users stays open, because it is worth more than 1 point. Close it before the assessment and the remaining four items can sit on a POA&M: the result is Conditional status, which becomes Final once a close-out assessment confirms them.
Few defense contractors run everything themselves. Cloud services, managed service providers and security operations providers all touch the CUI environment, and CMMC treats each according to what it does for you.
The question an assessor asks is simple: for each requirement, who meets it, and where is the proof? Readiness answers it before the assessment, provider by provider.
A cloud service provider that stores, processes or transmits CUI for you must be FedRAMP Moderate authorized, or meet FedRAMP Moderate equivalency as the DoD CIO defines it, with the body of evidence that definition calls for.
A provider that delivers security functions to your CUI environment is in scope as a Security Protection Asset. Its tools, people and access are examined as part of your assessment, against the requirements relevant to what it provides.
Providers that are not cloud service providers do not need a CMMC status of their own to support you; they are assessed within your scope instead, so their practices become your evidence.
A customer responsibility matrix records which requirements each provider meets, which you meet and which you share. Assessors ask for it, and it has to agree with the provider’s own documentation.
ITAR and EAR data add limits on who may access it and where it may be stored and supported. The cloud tier and support model you choose have to satisfy those rules as well as CMMC.
DFARS 252.204-7012 requires rapid reporting of cyber incidents to the DoD through DIBNet, which needs a DoD-approved medium assurance certificate, along with preserving images of affected systems and submitting malicious software. Your providers’ contracts have to support that duty.
Every CMMC status carries an affirmation: a statement, entered in SPRS by a senior official of your company, that you meet the requirements of the level you claim and will keep meeting them.
An affirmation is a representation to the government. The Department of Justice’s Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative uses the False Claims Act against contractors that misrepresent their cybersecurity, so an affirmation made on reassurance rather than evidence is a legal exposure for the company and for the person who signs.
An affirming official: a senior-level representative of your company who is responsible for ensuring compliance with CMMC requirements and has the authority to affirm continuing compliance.
When your self-assessment or certification assessment results are recorded, alongside the score.
An annual affirmation of continuing compliance, at every level, for as long as the status is needed.
When a close-out assessment confirms the open items are met and status moves from Conditional to Final.
Evidence an assessor would accept: a current SSP, an inventory that matches the network, logs that are reviewed and records that show controls operating. Readiness gives your official that record, and affirmation upkeep keeps it current.
The three packages above are the natural way in. Some of these engagements cover the same ground as one combined readiness engagement; others fit particular situations — Level 1 only, a self-assessment, a Level 3 path, a supplier base, a POA&M to close or an affirmation to keep current — and all of it is the work a C3PAO is not allowed to do for you. Every one ends with documents you keep and evidence you can show.
Confirm that Level 1 really is your level, then meet and evidence every FAR 52.204-21 requirement before your senior official signs.
You receiveScore yourself to the standard a C3PAO would apply, so the number you post and the affirmation behind it hold up if the DoD ever checks.
You receiveWalk into your certification assessment with a defensible scope, an SSP that matches reality and evidence mapped to every assessment objective.
You receiveMeet the 24 enhanced requirements selected from NIST SP 800-172 on top of a Level 2 environment that holds Final C3PAO status for the same scope.
You receiveFind where CUI actually lives, decide where it should live and draw a boundary you can defend to an assessor.
You receiveAn independent look at every assessment objective, the way an assessor would examine, interview and test, so nothing on assessment day is a surprise.
You receiveClose every open item on your POA&M with evidence a close-out assessment will accept, before Conditional status runs out.
You receiveKnow which suppliers receive FCI or CUI, which level each one needs and whether their SPRS status supports the work you plan to flow down.
You receiveKeep the record behind each annual affirmation current as people, systems and providers change.
You receiveA written conclusion on which CMMC level and assessment type apply to you, tied to the information you handle and the clauses in your contracts and solicitations.
A boundary diagram and an asset inventory sorted into the CMMC asset categories, with the reasoning for each — the scoping argument you’ll put in front of an assessor.
Every requirement and assessment objective marked met, not met or partially met, with the evidence you have, the evidence you lack and what closing each gap involves.
An SSP written from your real environment: system description, boundary, roles, and an implementation statement for every requirement in scope.
Your score under the DoD Assessment Methodology, requirement by requirement, so the number you post and the number an assessor reaches are the same number.
Prioritized remediation that closes the high-weight requirements first, plus a POA&M that only defers what the rule lets you defer.
Policies and procedures for the requirement families that need them, written to match how your people actually work rather than a generic template.
A matrix showing which requirements your cloud providers, MSP and other external service providers meet, which you meet, and the documentation that proves it.
An index pointing each assessment objective to its artifact, and a walk-through with the people an assessor will interview so they know what will be asked of them.
Better found now, by people on your side, than by your assessor.
CUI that has spread to email, file shares, laptops and engineering tools well beyond the system everyone believes is in scope
An SSP written from a template that describes controls nobody operates
Cloud services storing or processing CUI that are neither FedRAMP Moderate authorized nor documented as meeting FedRAMP Moderate equivalency
Encryption that is strong but not FIPS-validated, which can’t be accepted for protecting the confidentiality of CUI
Multifactor authentication on remote access but not on privileged local access or on network access for every user
Audit logs collected but never reviewed, correlated or tied to an alerting process
An SPRS score that counted partially implemented requirements as met
MSPs with administrative access to the CUI environment and no documented split of responsibilities
CMMC follows the information, not the industry label. If FCI or CUI reaches you through a defense contract or a prime, so does CMMC.
Airframe, propulsion, avionics and munitions programs share drawings and specifications marked as controlled technical information with every tier of the supply chain.
One part made to a DoD drawing can bring CUI onto your CAM workstations, CNC controllers and shop-floor file shares.
Design work, test data and technical reports for defense programs are often CUI from the moment you create them.
Source code, configuration data and support tickets tied to a defense customer can be CUI, and your platform can become a service provider inside someone else’s scope.
When you administer a defense contractor’s systems, your tools and people sit inside their assessment as Security Protection Assets, and they will ask how you meet the requirements you take on.
Sponsored research and DoD funding can carry CUI and DFARS clauses into environments built for openness.
Manifests, maintenance records and technical manuals for defense equipment carry FCI, and often CUI.
Staffing, consulting, training and facilities firms that hold only contract information still face Level 1 and its annual affirmation.
Requirement RA.L2-3.11.2 calls for periodic vulnerability scanning and scanning when new vulnerabilities are identified, and RA.L2-3.11.3 for remediating them according to risk; assessors ask for the scan results and the remediation trail.
What the test coversAn internal test shows whether a compromised workstation can reach CUI, which is direct evidence for access control and boundary requirements. Level 3 adds a penetration testing requirement from NIST SP 800-172 (CA.L3-3.12.1e).
What the test coversIf an enclave is what keeps the rest of your network out of scope, a segmentation test proves the boundary holds — support for SC.L2-3.13.1 and for the scoping argument itself.
What the test coversGovernment cloud tenants are where CUI often lives. A configuration review checks them against the requirements you claim and the responsibilities you inherit from the provider.
What the test coversInternet-facing systems are the front door to the CUI environment; testing them gives you boundary protection evidence and real findings to fix before an assessor looks.
What the test coversSecurity awareness training is a Level 2 requirement, and Level 3 adds training focused on social engineering and advanced threats; a phishing exercise shows whether that training changes behavior.
What the test coversLevel 2 requires you to authorize wireless access and protect it with authentication and encryption (AC.L2-3.1.16 and 3.1.17); a wireless test shows whether those controls hold in practice.
What the test coversThe information decides, and the solicitation confirms. If you only handle FCI, Level 1 applies. If you handle CUI, Level 2 applies, and the solicitation states whether a self-assessment or a C3PAO certification assessment is required. Level 3 is identified by the DoD for specific programs. Readiness reads your contracts, your CUI flows and the clauses your prime flows down, and gives you a written answer rather than a guess.
No. Level 2 certification assessments are performed only by C3PAOs authorized by the Cyber AB, and Level 3 assessments only by DIBCAC. CyberlySecure is not a C3PAO and holds no Cyber AB designation. That separation works in your favor: a C3PAO can’t consult for a company it assesses, so readiness and assessment have to come from different firms anyway, and we stay on your side throughout.
Both measure the same 110 requirements and the same NIST SP 800-171A objectives. In a self-assessment, you score yourself and your senior official affirms the result in SPRS. In a certification assessment, an independent C3PAO examines your documents, interviews your people and tests your systems before issuing a status. The contract decides which one you face, but the preparation is identical: a self-assessment that wouldn’t survive a C3PAO is a liability, not a shortcut.
Sometimes. At Level 2, you can reach Conditional status if your score meets the minimum the rule sets — 88 of a possible 110 points — and every open item is one the rule allows on a POA&M. Higher-weighted requirements generally can’t be deferred, and conditional status expires unless a POA&M close-out assessment confirms the gaps are closed in the window the rule sets. Level 1 allows no POA&M at all. Readiness tells you early which gaps you must close before the assessment, not after.
Not necessarily. Any cloud service that stores, processes or transmits CUI must be FedRAMP Moderate authorized or meet FedRAMP Moderate equivalency as the DoD defines it, and export-controlled data adds its own restrictions on who can access it. Many companies move CUI to a government cloud tenant; others keep it in a tightly scoped enclave or a different authorized service. Readiness weighs those options against your contracts, your data and your people.
CMMC Level 2 assesses against Rev 2, as the program rule specifies, and the DoD has kept DFARS contracts on Rev 2 for now through a class deviation. For now, build and assess to Rev 2, and note where Rev 3 changes the picture so the work carries forward when the requirement eventually moves.
That the company meets, and continues to meet, the requirements of the level it claims. Affirmations are entered in SPRS at the assessment, at least annually afterward and after a POA&M close-out. Because an inaccurate affirmation can create False Claims Act exposure, the official needs evidence, not reassurance — readiness gives them the record behind the signature.
It already can. The DFARS rule took effect on November 10, 2025, and the DoD is bringing requirements in over four rollout periods that begin on November 10 of 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028. From November 10, 2026, applicable solicitations can require Level 2 (C3PAO) certification as a condition of award. Your solicitations and your prime’s flow-downs say exactly which level and assessment type apply; readiness reads them with you and tells you what that means for your next bid.
It can. From the start of the rollout, the DoD may require a CMMC status before it exercises an option, and from full implementation on November 10, 2028, CMMC requirements apply to option periods on applicable contracts generally. A contract you already hold can bring CMMC with it at its next option, so the status you need is the one your next option calls for, not only your next new award.
DFARS 252.204-7021 requires a prime to flow the CMMC requirement down to every subcontractor that will process, store or transmit FCI or CUI, at the level that matches the information that subcontractor receives. The prime also has to confirm you hold that status before awarding the work. If you will receive only FCI, Level 1 is your requirement even when your prime needs Level 2. Readiness pins down what you actually receive, so you build to the right level rather than the highest one mentioned.
If your MSP or MSSP provides security functions to the CUI environment, yes: its tools, people and access are Security Protection Assets inside your assessment. A provider that is not a cloud service provider does not need its own CMMC status to support you, but your assessor will examine what it does on your behalf. A customer responsibility matrix that matches the provider’s own documentation is the evidence that holds this together, and readiness builds it with you and your provider.
ITAR and EAR govern who may access the data, generally limiting it to US persons unless a license allows otherwise, and constrain where it is stored and who supports the systems that hold it. CMMC does not replace those rules; it sits beside them. That shapes your cloud tier, your support providers and your access controls. Readiness maps where export-controlled data goes and checks your boundary and providers against both sets of obligations; your export-compliance counsel remains the authority on licensing.
They are different service tiers, and they differ in the authorizations they carry, where data is stored, who can support it and whether they are built for export-controlled data. Which fits depends on the CUI you hold, whether ITAR or EAR data is involved and what your contracts and primes require. Readiness compares your data with each tier’s published documentation and the DoD’s FedRAMP Moderate equivalency requirements. CyberlySecure sells no licenses, so the answer follows your data, not a reseller margin.
Correct it. Update your SPRS entry to a score you can support, put a plan behind the open requirements and make sure your next affirmation rests on evidence. An inflated score left in place is the exposure; a corrected score with a credible plan is a position you can defend. Talk to counsel about any past affirmation. Readiness rebuilds the score requirement by requirement so the new number holds when someone checks it.
Final Level 2 (C3PAO) status for the same assessment scope. Level 3 then adds 24 requirements selected from NIST SP 800-172, aimed at advanced persistent threats, and DIBCAC performs the assessment. Level 3 applies only to programs the DoD identifies in the solicitation, and a company that faces it goes through both assessments in sequence. Readiness prepares both, on one consistent scope.
No. The rule does not require readiness work or any particular provider for it. But a C3PAO assessment is a single examination with consequences for award, and a self-assessment carries a senior official’s affirmation to the government. Finding your gaps beforehand, with people on your side of the table, is how you avoid learning about them from the assessor or from a contracting officer.
Build to Rev 2. It is the version 32 CFR Part 170 names for CMMC Level 2, and the one your assessor will test against; moving CMMC to Rev 3 would take a change to the rule. Rev 3 reorganizes the requirements and adds organization-defined parameters, so readiness notes where your controls already meet its wording, and the move costs less when it comes.
Because an assessor has to be independent of the work it judges. A C3PAO may not assess a company it has provided CMMC consulting to, and DIBCAC is part of the DoD itself. The separation protects you as well: the people helping you find and fix gaps sit on your side of the table, and the people deciding your status come to it fresh.
No. Nothing in the rule requires your preparation to come from a Cyber AB-registered provider; what an assessor weighs is your evidence, not who helped you build it. To be clear about where CyberlySecure stands: it holds no Cyber AB designation. It is not a C3PAO and not a Registered Practitioner Organization. That keeps the line clean: the firm preparing you is never the firm deciding your status.
Level 1 (Self) is renewed every year with a fresh self-assessment and affirmation. Level 2 and Level 3 statuses run on a triennial cycle, with an affirmation every year in between. Conditional status lasts only for the close-out window the rule sets. A significant change to the environment you were assessed on can also call for a new assessment, which is why affirmation upkeep tracks change, not just the calendar.
Three kinds of evidence for every assessment objective: documents they examine, such as policies, the SSP and records; people they interview; and systems they test. The CMMC Assessment Guide for each level sets out the objectives and the methods. A requirement is met only when every objective behind it is met, which is why readiness works at the objective level rather than the headline of each requirement.
Partly. Policies, risk assessments, access reviews and logging built for SOC 2 or ISO 27001 often answer many CMMC requirements. But CMMC adds a CUI-specific boundary, FIPS-validated cryptography, DFARS incident reporting and evidence at the level of each assessment objective, and a SOC 2 report or ISO certificate is not accepted in place of a CMMC assessment. Readiness maps what you have so you build only what is missing.
One conversation with someone who does this work. You leave knowing where you likely stand and what readiness would involve for you.
Not sure where to start? One of our testers reviews your internet-facing footprint and sends you a short summary of what an attacker would see — free. Nothing you don’t own is ever touched, and there’s no sales sequence.
Free. No obligation.